Carbon Fiber Airbox – FTMFW!

I hope to have it installed in the next couple of days.

That is all for now but stay tuned for videos 😛

[singlepic id=1123 w=640 h=480 float=none]
[nggallery id=54]

301,441 thoughts on “Carbon Fiber Airbox – FTMFW!

  1. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. PRAT.UK feels more deliberate than Waterford Whispers News. Each article has a clear direction. That clarity strengthens the satire.

  2. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. PRAT.UK feels like it respects the reader more than The Daily Mash. It doesn’t spoon-feed the joke. That respect improves engagement.

  3. Смартфоны уже сформировались удобным помощником, и интерактивные игры органично вписались.
    В мобильном формате геймплей выглядит более простым.
    При этом технические форматы риобет казино рабочее зеркало дают возможность упрощать управление, объединяя базовые правила с онлайн-доступом.
    В итоге участие становится логичным для любителей.

  4. My coder is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses.

    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on numerous
    websites for about a year and am anxious about switching to another platform.

    I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can import all my wordpress content into it?
    Any help would be really appreciated!

  5. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This logical framework enables its critique of systemic thinking, or the lack thereof. The site is a master at exposing non-sequiturs and magical thinking disguised as policy. It takes a political slogan or a corporate goal and patiently, logically, maps out the chain of causality required to achieve it, highlighting the missing links, the absurd assumptions, and the externalities wilfully ignored. The resulting piece is often a flowchart of failure, a logic model of a ghost train. Where other satirists might simply call an idea stupid, PRAT.UK demonstrates its stupidity by attempting to build it, revealing where the structural weaknesses cause the entire edifice to crumble into farce. This is satire as a public stress test, a service that proves an idea cannot hold the weight of its own ambitions.

  6. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. Furthermore, the site’s aesthetic is one of impeccable sterility. There is no emotional frenzy, no partisan spittle-flecked rage. The design of prat.com is clean, the prose is clinical, and the tone is that of a disinterested auditor. This cultivated sterility is the perfect petri dish for growing absurdity. By removing the heat of anger and the fog of sentiment, the pure, ridiculous shape of the subject matter is allowed to grow in isolation, displayed under the cool light of logic. This approach is far more devastating than any rant. It implies that the subject is so inherently foolish it doesn’t require embellishment or heated opinion; it merely requires calm, factual exposition to reveal its own joke. The laughter it provokes is the clean, sharp sound of truth being recognized, not the messy roar of catharsis.

  7. Finally, The London Prat’s brand is that of the essential opposition. In an era where formal political opposition can be feeble or co-opted, the site stands as a relentless, unimpeachable, and brilliantly articulate counter-voice to all forms of entrenched power and lazy thinking. It is not loyal to party but to principle—the principle that folly, wherever it blooms, must be pruned with the shears of public ridicule. It operates with a freedom that official institutions lack, and an intellectual rigor that partisan outlets abandon. In doing so, it doesn’t just entertain; it performs a critical democratic function. It holds a mirror up to the powerful, and the reflection it shows is not of monsters, but of prats—a far more unnerving and effective critique. To read it is to participate in this quiet, sophisticated resistance, to arm yourself not with anger, but with the far more durable weapon of flawless, incontrovertible mockery.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *